Krakowiak ()
Description
The krakowiak is an improvised pair or group dance, characterised by a two-measure metre, syncopated and semiquaver rhythms, and lively tempos. Its trademark features include forward steps with a jump, sideways steps with the joining of legs, frequent clicking of heels, strikes and accentuated steps, as well as the mutual chasing between partners combined with running by other performers. In the traditional krakowiak, dance components are intertwined with singing by subsequent dancers. The national form of the krakowiak was fashioned after the country dances from the area around Cracow, and underwent stylistic changes between the 18th and 20th century, catering to the requirements of ballroom and stage aesthetics, as well as the budding nationalism (which used the krakowiak to foster the sense of community and promote inherent cultural values), arriving at a standardized dance highly popular with all social classes.
Compared to the polonaise and the mazur, the history of the krakowiak as a national dance is much shorter, although its roots seem to go back deeper than suggested in numerous publications which trace them to the premiere of Wojciech Bogusławski and Jan Stefani’s vaudeville Cud mniemany, czyli Krakowiacy i Górale [The Supposed Miracle, or Cracovians and Highlanders]. While it is indeed difficult to agree with Feliks Starczewski’s unfounded claim that the dance was adopted by Polish knights as early as during the reign of Casimir the Great[1], Adolf Chybiński did indicate the presence of krakowiak rhythms in the tablature of Jan of Lublin (ca. 1540)[2]. Karol Czerniawski[3] and his continuators were likewise inclined to relate such 16th and 17th century terms as “goniony”, “wielki” and “mały”[4] to the krakowiak. Based on Jan Chryzostom Pasek’s diaries[5], which featured descriptions of a dance of two men, suggestions have been made of a martial origin of the krakowiak. Still, the earliest accounts of “goniony” and “mieniony” from the first half of the 17th century are devoid of the syncopated rhythms typical of the krakowiak[6]. At present, they are thought to be other fast dances (e.g. the courante), performed after slow dances. At the same time, though, they could possess the features of local dances which preceded the krakowiak as understood today.
The first unquestionable mentions of the krakowiak came in the second half of the 18th century in Jan Prosnak’s remarks on the arias in the 1st act of Maciej Kamieński’s 1778 opera Nędza uszczęśliwiona [Poverty Made Happy, and Kasia’s aria in the 1790 opera Słowik [The Nightingale][7]. The krakowiak was likely also performed by the dancers of his Majesty the King at the National Theatre around 1788 at the performances of the ballet Królowa Wanda [Queen Wanda], which provisioned the participation of Cracovians[8] and a “wedding ceremony in conformity with the current custom of peasants from the area around Cracow”, concluded by the ballet excerpt from Józef Daniel Kurtz’s Krakowiacy i Kozacy [Cracovians and Cossacks][9]. Krakowiaks were also included in the immensely popular vaudeville Cud mniemany, czyli Krakowiacy i Górale [The Supposed Miracle, or Cracovians and Highlanders] by Wojciech Bogusławski and Jan Stefani (1794). Moreover, Jędrzej Kitowicz listed the krakowiak as a social dance of Polish nobility at the time [10], while Łukasz Gołębiowski claimed that the dance was performed in front of Stanisław August Poniatowski by dancers wearing “costumes of the people”[11]. Michał Mioduszewski[12] listed the krakowiak among the songs of late 18th century students, and Wincenty Lessel’s account from a visit to the Czartoryski family mansion in Puławy in 1804 describes its residents as “devoid of vocal talent, who (…) would sing nothing but the krakowiak”[13]. Krakowiaks were written by a number of composers at the time, including Józef Elsner and Ernst Theodor Amadeus Hoffmann.
Kazimierz Brodziński’s poem Wiesław (1820) was likely inspired by his impressions of the new versions of Cud Mniemany (i.e. Zabobon, czyli Krakowiacy i Górale [The Superstition, or Cracovians and Highlanders] and Nowe krakowiaki [New Cracovians] by Karol Kurpiński). The poem contained the first literary description of the national krakowiak. Several years later, a more extensive description of the krakowiak was featured in Brodziński’s study on national dances; the formal arrangement of the dance included a circular procession, a song by a dancer in front of an instrumental ensemble, a mutual chase of the male and female dancer, and stationary spins in the closed hold[14].
Particularly important to the national form of the krakowiak was Karol Kurpiński and Józef Damse’s 1823 ballet Wesele krakowskie w Oycowie [The Cracow Wedding in Ojców]. Based on Cud mniemany, the ballet was choreographed by Julia Mierzyńska and Maurice Pion, becoming an instant hit (over 400 performances in Warsaw). The music and dances included in the ballet were popular not only in musical parlors and ballrooms but also at carnival sleigh rides which, starting in the early 1820s, would featured the traditional Cracovian costumes and wedding dances Wesele krakowskie also doubtlessly contributed to the dissemination of the krakowiak throughout nearly all territories of the former Commonwealth[16], including the areas traditionally inhabited by Ukrainians, Belarusians, Lithuanians and Latvians, as well as in Western Pomerania. Twenty years later, a similar phenomenon accompanied the ballet Okrężne pod Kielcami [Harvest Festival Near Kielce], composed by Józef Stefani and choreographed by Roman Turczynowicz, who invigorated the krakowiak with an element of the then outdated gallop dance, i.e. the gallop step[17]. At the same time, thanks to the guest appearances of Polish dancers abroad (among them the famous Fanny Elssler), the krakowiak was taken up in other European countries. As recounted by August Bournonville in 1841, Elssler’s performances included the following components: coupé balloné trois fois, 3 coups de talon, repeté 4 fois jusque, sur le coude pied coupé, en tournant, l’autre pied, l’autre, trois coups l’autre jambe, coupé balloné en tournant, assemblé sissonne, 2 fois de l’autre côté, echappé temps levé, coupé foëtté, pas anglaise sur le talon 2 fois, echappé pas couru retournez bas, flic flac talons, précipité 4 fois, en tournant doublé 4 fois, pas de mazurka dos à dos au public de l’autre côté, tour entier, promenade à la cosaque 4 fois, balancé aux epérons sissonneen tournant (encore), coupé balloné trois fois, 3 coups de talon, 2 fois, promenade à la cosaque main sur chapeau un tour 2 fois[18].
Karol Czerniawski’s 1847 and 1860 books were the first to compile all available information on the krakowiak[19]. The first descriptions of country krakowiaks, more literary than documentary in form, were published by Józef Mączyński[20]. More details were added by Oskar Kolberg in the second volume of his Krakowskie, published in 1873. Kolberg pointed out that villagers from the area around Cracow did not practice any unified dance form which we could identify with the krakowiak. Still, various dances similar to each other did exists, assuming such names as goniony, dreptany, suwany, zachodny, z góry, góral, hosiany, liska, cichy, skalmierzak[21]. The dominant form at the time was the one which began with slow, gliding steps and gradually accelerated by means of jump steps, followed by a transition to gallop[22]. The przebiegany krakowiak, chich featured the element of chasing the female partner, was danced mostly during weddings, accompanied by characteristic torso bows, accentuated steps and spectacular knee bends performer by men[23]. These dances laid the foundation for the stage arrangements at the time, since it was precisely that area which Virgilio Calori visited in 1873 while preparing his choreography to Adolf Sonnenfeld’s ballet Pan Twardowski (the work premiered on July 6, 1874)[24]. The stage arrangements subsequently served as a prototype for their ballroom arrangements.
At the same time, the krakowiak began to appear in the handbooks of social dances. Arkadiusz Kleczewski [25] concluded that “the krakowiak bears neither tail coats nor elegant parlour gown”, suggesting that the dance was performed solely during sleigh rides or the so-called “Cracow weddings”, i.e. parties organized to celebrate various occasions such as namesdays, for which dancers would typically wear costumes fashioned after those worn in the region of Cracow. Kleczewski observed that a “Cracow wedding” began with a song sung repeatedly by consecutive couples in turns with a “whirling” (sic!) circular dance. Kleczewski listed a number of complex figures, among them the “zawierucha” (which featured a large circle, small circlets, criss-cross, à gauche, tour de main, and spins), and “toastowa” (which featured a large circle, clicking of heels and spins). Kleczewski also permitted certain mazur figures and the introduction of other dances such as the oberek. Karol Mestenhauser’s[26] description invoked Karol Czerniawski and Kazimierz Brodziński, whose Wiesław became the cornerstone for the complex figure of the sleigh ride version of the “Cracow wedding” with songs. Mestenhauser’s description of the gallop is very detailed and lists such additional components as the pas marché, clicking of heels, clicking of heels with gliding steps, and strikes. Apart from the basic holds, Mestenhauser enumerated the characteristic gestures which undoubtedly commemorated the feats of scythe bearers during the Cracow Uprising (left hands of male dancers are thrust upwards, “as if piercing the air”), or recalled the Cossack dance, by then no longer present in the canon of national dances (“hand resting on the back of the head, on the hat”). Mestenauser also mentioned such “Cracow wedding” figures as “para za parą” [pair after pair], “para na prawo – para na lewo” [pair to the right, pair to the left], “przez środek sali” [through the middle of the room], “zamiana miejsc w liniach” [changing places in lines], “młynek” [spin], “goniona” [the chased lady], “łańcuch” [chain], “liniami do przodu” [forward in lines], “wężyk” [in line], “na odbijanego” [partner switch]. Apart from these, Mestenhauser further described the „zawierucha” figure, chich included the following components: para za parą [pair afte pair], à gauche, tour de main, spins, circles, little circlets, criss-crossing, and the finale. Mestenhauser’s descriptions were also available in abridged forms in Mieczysław Rościszewski’s handbook[27].
In the interwar period, the krakowiak was no longer a staple in the ballroom repertoire. Instead, it entered school and academic curricula as part of physical education and cultural and aesthetic courses, as propagated by Walerian Sikorski and Zofia Nożyńska[28]. Of most significant in this regard were Józef Waxman’s handbooks published in the second half of the 1930s [29]. Waxman’s description featured the following steps: “zwykły” (regular step), “półobrót w lewo” (halfturn to the left), left and right step with the clicking of heels, “kwadrat hołubcowy” [square with the clicking of heels], jump step, cross-legged step, and the final step. Jan Ostrowski-Naumoff[30] listed the gliding step, swinging step, cross-legged step, mincing step, “hołupiec”, “utykany” [limping step], “stąpany” [treading], and the final step, along with the accompanied figures – gallop (sic!), rotary, swinging, criss-crossed, “hołupcowa”, parting of partners, circlet, and the finale. Ostrowski-Naumoff was also precise in his description of hand positions. Zofia Kwaśnicowa’s minutely methodological publication[31] enumerates the gallop, gallop with jumps, rotary step with jumps, clicking of heels with jumps, as well as preparatory exercises and an exemplary dance arrangement. Kwaśnicowa’s work was fundamental for her continuators, the most prominent of whom was Zofia Majewiczowa[32], who listed variable jumps along with the gallop, basic steps, rotary steps, steps with the clicking of heels (“hołubcowy”/”domachowy”), and strikes, accompanied by such figures as a “kołowrotek” turn, lunge sideways in a pair, forward in a pair, rotation, “haczyk” [hook], spin, male dancer kneel, whirling, and “hołubcowa w kwadracie” [square with the clicking of heels]. Majewiczowa also significantly expanded the number of group figures in the krakowiak, taking into consideration its stage presentations. The list of group figures provided by Majewiczowa includes the circle, concentric circles, circlets, cog Wheel, carousels, changing of places in lines, procession of pairs, female dancers to the left – male dancers to the right, pair to the left – pair to the right, passing of pairs, through the middle in fours, four to the left – four to the right, through the middle in eights, in line, in line underneath gates formed by other dancers, chain, star, cross, labyrinth, “dobierany” and “wybierany”, and the krakowiak with a female dancer on the left hand side. Similar to Kwaśnicowa’s description of the dance, although different in their scope, were the compilations prepared by Franciszek Zozula[33], Irena Ostrowska[34], Bożena Bednarzowa[35] and other authors of repertories which summarised the listed works.
The gradual accumulation of initiatives of choreographers, dance masters, theoreticians, teachers and dance instructors, and ethnochoreologists led to recurring expansions and restrictions in the number of krakowiak components. Contemporary pedagogical, stage and tournament practices tend to adhere to the typology proposed in the 1980s by the Council of Experts on Folklore appointed by the Ministry of Culture and Art and codified by Czesław Sroka[36]. Sroka’s typology indicates that the present form of the krakowiak is a combination of all elements derived from dances performed in the krakowiak rhythms in the region of Małopolska and a range of solutions introduced by theatre choreographers and dance teachers, jointly amounting to:
– 4 types of holds ,
– 8 positions for pairs,
– 5 possible ways of moving (one of which includes 10 subtypes),
– 10 ornamental movement forms (the so-called “hołubce” heel clicks, strikes, and rotating steps),
– 7 types of ornament al leg gestures,
– 17 figures for pairs.
Bibliography
- [1] F. Starczewski, Die Polnischen Tänze, „Sammelbände der Internationalen Musik Gesellschaft”, Leipzig 1900-1901, s. 682.
- [2] A. Chybiński, Tabulatura Jana z Lublina (1540), „Kwartalnik Muzyczny”, zeszyt 4, Kraków 1911, s. 297-340.
- [3] K. Czerniawski, Charakterystyka tańców, Warszawa 1847, s. 44-45; tenże, O Tańcach narodowych naszych z poglądem historycznym i estetycznym, Warszawa 1860, s. 69-71.
- [4] Postępek prawa czartowskiego przeciw narodowi ludzkiemu, wyd. A. Benis, „Biblioteka pisarzów polskich”, t. 22, Kraków 1892, s. 91; A. Chybiński, Tabulatura organowa Jana z Lublina (1540), „Kwartalnik Muzyczny”, Warszawa 1911, z. I-IV; 36 tańców z tabulatury organowej Jana z Lublina, opr. A. Chybiński, Kraków 1948; M. Rej, Dzieła wszystkie, Seria B, nr 1, t. 1, Wrocław 1953, s. 66; J. Kochanowski, Dzieła polskie, red. A. Jelicz, Warszawa 1953, s. 363; M. Bielski, Satyry, wyd. W. Wisłocki, Biblioteka pisarzów polskich, t. 4, Kraków 1889, s. 45, 62; K. Miaskowski, Mięsopust Polski, Zbiór rytmów Kaspra Miaskowskiego (wedle wydania z r. 1622 w Poznaniu w drukarni Jana Rossowskiego), wyd. J. Turowski, Kraków 1861, s. 295; H. Morsztyn, Światowa rozkosz, w: J.I. Kraszewski, Pomniki do historii obyczajów w Polsce z XVI i XVII w., Warszawa 1843, s. 155-184; J.Ch. Pasek, Pamiętniki Jana Chryzostoma Paska z czasów panowania Jana Kazimierza, Michała Korybuta i Jana III, red. E. Raczyński, Poznań 1836, s. 220; K. Badecki, Polska liryka mieszczańska, Lwów 1936, s. 65.
- [5] J.Ch. Pasek, Pamiętniki Jana Chryzostoma Paska…, dz. cyt., s. 258.
- [6] Z. Stęszewska, Cechy muzyczne polskich tańców narodowych, w: Różne formy tańców polskich, red. I. Ostrowska, Warszawa 1981, s. 193.
- [7] J. Prosnak, Kultura muzyczna Warszawy XVIII wieku, Kraków 1955, s. 131.
- [8] B. Mamontowicz-Łojek, François Gabriel Le Doux, baletmistrz i choreograf 1755–1823, „Pamiętnik Teatralny: czasopismo kwartalne poświęcone historii i krytyce teatru” 1967 tom 16, nr 2 (62); s. 219.
- [9] S. Morozińska, Ze studiów nad kostiumem w polskim teatrze Oświecenia, „Pamiętnik Teatralny”, Warszawa 1954, nr 3-4, s. 99; K. Wierzbicka-Michalska, Tancerze Jego Królewskiej Mości, w: K. Wierzbicka-Michalska, Sześć studiów o teatrze stanisławowskim, Wrocław-Warszawa-Kraków 1967 [Studia z dziejów teatru w Polsce pod redakcją Tadeusza Siverta, tom V], s. 187, 217; J. Pudełek, Warszawski balet romantyczny 1802-1866, Kraków 1967, s. 11; J. Prosnak, Kultura muzyczna Warszawy XVIII wieku, Kraków 1955, s. 190.
- [10] J. Kitowicz, Opis obyczajów za panowania Augusta III, Wrocław-Warszawa-Kraków 1970, s. 415.
- [11] Ł. Gołębiowski, Gry i zabawy różnych stanów w kraju całym, lub niektórych tylko prowincyach, Warszawa 1831, s. 321-322.
- [12] O. Kolberg, Lud. Jego zwyczaje, sposób życia, mowa, podania, przysłowia, obrzędy, gusła, zabawy, pieśni, muzyka i tańce. Serya VI, Krakowskie. Część druga, Kraków 1873, s. 245-246.
- [13] Z listu do syna z 15 lutego 1804 roku, zob. H. Rudnicka-Kruszewska, Wincenty Lessel. Szkic biograficzny na podstawie listów do syna, Kraków 1968, s. 114.
- [14] K. Brodziński, Wyjątek z pisma o tańcach przez Kazimierza Brodzińskiego, „Melitele” nr 1, 1829, s. 96-97.
- [15] O. Kolberg, Lud. Jego zwyczaje, sposób życia, mowa, podania, przysłowia, obrzędy, gusła, zabawy, pieśni, muzyka i tańce, Serya V, Krakowskie, Część pierwsza, Kraków 1871, s. 252, 253, 255.
- [16] K.W. Wójcicki, Ostatni kulig staropolski, „Tygodnik Ilustrowany” 1861 III, s. 164; O. Kolberg, Góry i Podgórze, cz. II, Dzieła wszystkie, tom 44, Wrocław-Poznań, s. 75, 84.
- [17] W. Tomaszewski, Warszawskie edytorstwo muzyczne w latach 1772-1865, Warszawa 1992, s. 167-171.
- [18] K.A. Jürgensen, Reconstructing la Cracovienne, „Dance Chronicle” 1983 (vol. 6), no. 3, s. 250-252.
- [19] K. Czerniawski, Charakterystyka tańców…, dz. cyt., s. 43-51; tenże, O tańcach narodowych…, dz. cyt., s. 67-79.
- [20] J. Mączyński, Włościanie z okolic Krakowa w zarysie, Kraków 1858, s. 90-95.
- [21] O. Kolberg, Pieśni ludu polskiego, Serya I, Warszawa 1857, s. VIII.
- [22] O. Kolberg, Lud…, Serya VI, Krakowskie, Część druga, dz. cyt., s. 377-378.
- [23] Tamże, s. 59-60.
- [24] Wiadomości miejscowe, „Kurier Warszawski” nr 182 z 26 sierpnia 1873, s. 1.
- [25] A. Kleczewski, Tańce Salonowe, Lwów 1879, s. 104-109.
- [26] K. Mestenhauser, Szkoła tańca Karola Mestenhausera w 3-ch częściach. Cz. 2 Tańce kołowe: galop, polka, polka mazurka z troteską, walce, oberek, tańce figurowe: kontredans, lansier, imperjal, polonez, krakowiak, kotiljon, Warszawa 1888, s. 197-214.
- [27] M. Rościszewski, Tańce salonowe. Praktyczny przewodnik dla tancerzy i wodzirejów uwzględniający tańce najnowsze i najmodniejsze z illustracyami, Warszawa 1904, s. 98-103.
- [28] W. Sikorski, Gimnastyka, cz. 2, Lwów 1930; tenże, Wychowanie fizyczne w szkole powszechnej (podręcznik dla nauczycieli), Poznań 1934, s. 133-136.
- [30] J. Ostrowski-Naumoff, Polskie tańce narodowe, „Teatr w Szkole”, 1936/1937, nr 7/8, s. 203-211.
- [31] Z. Kwaśnicowa, Zbiór pląsów II, Warszawa 1938, s. 7-75.
- [32] Z. Majewiczowa, Krakowiak, Warszawa 1951.
- [33] F. Zozula, Tańce ludowe, Warszawa 1952, s. 11-61.
- [34] Od form regionalnych do tańców towarzyskich, opr. I. Ostrowska, w: Różne formy tańców polskich, Warszawa 1980, s. 131-138; tejże, Krakowiak – układ sceniczny, w: Różne formy tańców polskich…, dz. cyt., s. 316-337.
- [35] B. Bednarzowa, M. Młodzikowska, Tańce: rytm – ruch – muzyka. Wybór dla potrzeb wychowania fizycznego, Warszawa 1983, s. 69-94.
- [36] C. Sroka, Polskie tańce narodowe, systematyka, Warszawa 1990, s. 13-22.