Oberek (national) ()

Description

The oberek (also referred to as the obertas, drygant, okrąglak, okrągły, wyrywas, wyrwany, wyrwas, zawijacz, etc.) is characterised by a three-measure metre, mazurka-like rhythmic, fast tempo, whirling, and a significant degree of improvisation manifested through numerous ornaments added to steps, holds, and hand gestures. In its national form, the oberek is a dance fashioned after the country dances of the Mazovia region, as remodelled by the upper classes in the 19th century, and subsequently adapted for stage and ballrooms, fitted to the requirements of the national ideology, popularised and standardised in line with the common convictions about its inherent physical and musical features.

In the light of musicological research, the rhythmic akin to that of the oberek appeared no sooner than in the 17th century[1], as corroborated by such terms of the epoch as: wyrwaniec (Hieronim Morsztyn, 1624), skoczne obwertasy (Adam Korczyński, 1675), or wyrwany (Jan Chryzostom Pasek, ca. 1690-1695)[2]. Still, due to the lack of descriptions of dances denoted by the aforementioned terms, it is difficult to identify them with the oberek. What should be noted, though, is that these dances were indeed mazurka-related genres which preceded the oberek. Danuta Idaszak claims the oberek emerged from the mazur as late as between 1750 and 1830[3], gradually superseding its country version. It was likely what Kazimierz Brodziński (1829) had in mind when suggesting the impact of the whirling dance introduced in Warsaw by the local German community at the turn of the 18th and 19th centuries[4]. The first Polish image of a whirling dance (by Michał Płoński , currently exhibited in Nieborów). Jan Prosnak argued the oberek was already danced in the late 18th century vaudevilles: Gaetano’s (Kajetan Majer’s) Żółta szlafmyca, albo kolęda na Nowy Rok [The Yellow Nightcap, or a New Years’ Carol] (1783), and Maciej Kamieński’s Słowik, czyli Kasia z Hanką na wydaniu [The Nightingale, or the Matchmaking of Kasia and Hanka] (1790)[5]. The oberek also appeares in the 1816 opera Superstition, or Cracoviennes and Highlanders by Karol Kurpiński and Jan Nepomucen Kamiński, as well as the 1823 ballet Wesele krakowskie w Oycowie [The Cracovian Wedding in Ojców] by Karol Kurpiński and Józef Damse (featuring fragments of Stefani’s vaudeville and choreographed by Julia Mierzyńska and Maurcice Pion[6]. It was also used in the final movement of Franciszek Lessel’s Piano Concerto in C-major. The name “obertas” occurs in Fryderyk Chopin’s 1825 correspondence, in which the composer describes a harvest festival in Obrowo[7]. Chopin was among the first composers to include oberek-like fragments in some of his Warsaw period mazurkas. Still, the name “oberek” first occurred in literature as late as in 1831 in Łukasz Gołebiowski’s Gry i zabawy różnych stanów… [Games and Plays of Various Social Classes..].[8] Chile the first composition bearing this name was Kazimierz Lubomirski’s 1839 Obertas-mazur . Then there is Karol Hauser’s Oberek from his 1846 collection Kwiaty karnawałowe [Carnival Flowers], the earliest known evidence for the performance of the oberek in Polish ballrooms.
The first description of the ballroom form of the oberek, perhaps inspired by the concurrent descriptions of its country forms[9], comes from Arkadiusz Kleczewski (1879). Kleczewski lists the whirling leftward and rich ornamentation (clicking of heels, “wyrwasy”, i.e. alternating right and left leg kneels, and swiping one’s leg along a curve) as the fundamental traits of the oberek[10]. Karol Mestenhauser ‘s 1888 text includes a list of advanced figures, including Nie uciekaj dziewczę, Zawadyjaka, Harne dziewuchy, Z wyrwasem, Obertas z Wieliczki, and Przepiórka [11]. Mieczysław Rościszewski’s handbook takes note of the fact that the oberek would often be danced towards the end of dancing events, with dancers also using the mazur steps (clicking of heels, pas marché) and the “wyrwasy” kneels[12].

The history of the dance in the 20th c. was guided by didacticism as first delineated by Zygmunt Kłośnik[13]. In the interwar period, more educational publications were released by Jan Ostrowski-Naumoff[14], Józef Waxman[15] and Zofia Kwaśnicowa[16]. More of such works continued to be published in the post-war period, noticeably blending the social and stage forms of the oberek [17].

The post-war era also saw the development of the stage form of the national oberek. Particularly impactful in this respect was Feliks Parnell, who supplemented the dance with à la chasse and pas de basque steps, as well as a series of squats and jumps, including jumps with turns, while also adding various forms of cabrioles and a wide range of ornaments, such as accentuated steps (e.g. in such stage works, as Umarł Maciek, umarł [Died, Maciek has died]and W parku [In the Park]). The dance was then complemented with the elements of the grotesque and acrobatics, including the trademark “kozioł” jumps[18]. Still more novelties were introduced by Jadwiga Hryniewiecka who, despite drawing from Oskar Kolberg’s canonical descriptions of the oberek (particularly those from the Kujavia region), nonetheless grossly exaggerated their choreographies[19].

Present-day performances mostly use the form set in 1987-1989 by the Council of Experts on Folklore appointed by the Ministry of Culture and Art. The Council precisely determined the positions, holds, and embraces for the dancing pair, along with the positions of hands and types of steps, male and female ornaments, as well as the figures performed by the dancing pair. All of these elements were described by Czesław Sroka in his Polskie tańce narodowe – systematyka [Polish Folk Dances: A Typology][20].

Bibliography

  • [1] E. Dahlig-Turek, „Rytmy polskie” w muzyce XVI-XIX wieku. Studium morfologiczne, Warszawa 2006, s. 193.
  • [2] Za: Z. Gloger, Encyklopedia staropolska ilustrowana, tom 4, Warszawa 1903, s. 356.
  • [3] D. Idaszak, Mazurek przed Chopinem, w: F.F. Chopin, red. Z. Lissa, Warszawa 1960, s. 246.
  • [4] K. Brodziński, Wyjątek z pisma o tańcach przez Kazimierza Brodzińskiego, „Melitele” nr 1, 1829, s. 97. Z tezą tą nie zgadzał się Karol Czerniawski, który jednak jeszcze w 1847 roku wśród peryferyjnych społeczności mazowieckich dostrzegał w oberku pozostałości mazura (zwanego drobnym lub wyrwasem); K. Czerniawski, Charakterystyka tańców przez Karola Czerniawskiego, Warszawa 1847, s. 51, 59-60. Potwierdzili to również późniejsi badacze: O. Kolberg, Pieśni ludu polskiego: serya I, zebrał i wydał Oskar Kolberg, Warszawa 1857, s. VIII; K. Mestenhauser, Szkoła tańca Karola Mestenhausera w trzech częściach, t. 2 Tańce kołowe: galop, polka, polka mazurka z troteską, walce, oberek. Tańce figurowe: kontredans, lansjer, imperial, polonez, krakowiak, kotylion, Warszawa 1888, s. 143-144; Z. Kwaśnicowa, Polskie tańce ludowe. Mazur, Warszawa 1953, s. 8.
  • [5] J. Prosnak, Kultura muzyczna Warszawy XVIII wieku, Kraków 1955, s. 131, 137.\
  • [6] K.A. Jürgensen, Reconstructing la cracovienne, „Dance Chronicle” 1982, nr 6, s. 233-234.
  • [7] List do rodziców z 26 sierpnia 1825 r.
  • [8] Ł. Gołębiowski, Gry i zabawy różnych stanów w kraju całym lub niektórych tylko prowincyach, Warszawa 1831, s. 246.
  • [9] K. Czerniawski, Charakterystyka tańców przez Karola Czerniawskiego, Warszawa 1847, s. 59-60; K. Zakrzewskiego, Obertas, Dodatek do „Lutni Polskiej”, Poznań 1855, nr 8, s. 58; O. Kolberg, Lud, jego zwyczaje, sposób życia, mowa, podania, przysłowia, obrzędy, gusła, zabawy, pieśni, muzyka i tańce, Seria IV, Kujawy, Część druga, Warszawa 1867, s. 199-203, 206-207; tenże, Lud…, Serya XII, W. Ks. Poznańskie. Część czwarta, Kraków 1879, odnośnik do s. 321; tenże, Lud…, Serya XIII. W. Ks. Poznańskie. Część piąta, Kraków 1880, s. V, IX-X.
  • [10] A. Kleczewski, Tańce salonowe, Lwów 1879, s. 99-104.
  • [11] K. Mestenhauser, Szkoła tańca Karola Mestenhausera w trzech częściach, Część II, Tańce kołowe: Galop – Polka – Polka Mazurka z Troteską – Walce – Oberek, Tańce figurowe: Kontredans – Lansjer – Imperjal – Polonez – Krakowiak – Kotiljon, Warszawa 1888, s. 143-158 (II 1901, III 1904, s. 149-155).
  • [12] M. Rościszewski, Tańce salonowe. Praktyczny przewodnik dla tancerzy i wodzirejów uwzględniający tańce najnowsze i najmodniejsze z illustracyami, Warszawa 1904, s. 103-104.
  • [13] Z. Kłośnik, O tańcach narodowych polskich, Lwów 1907.
  • [14] J. Ostrowski-Naumoff, Polskie tańce narodowe, „Teatr w Szkole” 1936/1937, nr 9, s. 253-261.
  • [15] J. Waxman, Tańce narodowe, Poznań 1936 (II wyd. – 1936, III wyd. – 1937, s. 58-62, 100-109, IV wyd. - 1946).
  • [16] Z. Kwaśnicowa, Zbiór pląsów II, Warszawa 1938, s. 168-174, 180-205.
  • [17] J. Hryniewiecka, Polskie tańce narodowe w formie towarzyskiej, Warszawa 1967 (wyd. 2 – 1971; wyd. 3 – 1973), Różne formy tańców polskich, red. I. Ostrowska, Warszawa 1980, s. 109-115, 295-315; B. Bednarzowa, M. Młodzikowska, Tańce: rytm – ruch – muzyka. Wybór dla potrzeb wychowania fizycznego, Warszawa 1983, s. 125-145; O. Kuźmińska, H. Popielewska, Taniec, rytm, muzyka, Seria: Skrypty Nr 116, Poznań 1995, s. 122-127.
  • [18] F. Parnell, Moje życie w sztuce tańca (pamiętniki 1898-1947), Łódź 2003, s. 239.
  • [19] J. Hryniewiecka, Sześć scenicznych układów polskich tańców ludowych, Warszawa 1961 (wyd. 2 - 1962); tejże, Tańce Harnama: polonez, mazur, oberek, kujawiak, Warszawa 1961; tejże, Pięć tańców polskich, Warszawa 1970; tejże, 5 tańców polskich, Warszawa 1990; Różne formy tańców polskich, red. I. Ostrowska, Warszawa 1980.
  • [20] C. Sroka, Polskie tańce narodowe – systematyka, Warszawa 1990, s. 38-43.